Hi Easlaner,
Thanks for your interest in my writings. I always appreciate questions as they help me to expanding my thoughts on these topics.
Q1. “each individual only experiences one timeline in each incarnation”. I thought through parallel universes, “I” get to experience all potential timelines a specific individual/person/incarnation can have. Am I wrong? I cannot find an article that specifically combines these issues.
A1. These ideas are largely based on my understandings of the Seth material by Jane Roberts, and more recently from talks by Matias De Stefano. You are right that I have written nothing specifically on this topic. Here, however, this is how I understand it…
— In our 3D incarnation, we experience life as 1 timeline. In fact, we are creating and “jumping” timelines constantly. But the final product from our 3D perception is a single timeline. From that perspective, we cannot see other timelines.
— But we are not always in our 3D perspective. We occasionally see the world from 4D and 5D perspectives. According to Seth, from those perspectives, we encounter, know, and share (subconsciously usually) the lives of our parallel selves in other timelines. Matias says from 4D we can see an entire timeline (incarnation) once. Having a past-life regression session is one way to tap into that 4D perspective. He says from 5D we see all our timelines at once. I think that is extremely rare for a 3D person to do. So, our limited 3D ego-self does not get to experience parallel experiences, but our astral/energy/etheric-self can.
FYI — — Just today, I updated the 4D and 5D parts of my article on “Matias De Stefano’s 9 Dimensions of Reality”. I expanded the 4D section with a lot of new material.
Q2. Is our soul the sum of all timelines in that specific incarnation example? And is that soul part of a bigger soul that experiences others?
A2. There are different understandings of the soul. The one that makes the most sense to me is that there is an individual soul that is one aspect/part of a larger oversoul that is one aspect/part of a still larger oversoul. That continues until we get to the single Universal Soul that contains all souls. So yes, all souls are part of a bigger soul that experiences the incarnations of all its spun-off sub-souls.
— But Seth also says that these different levels transition from one to another with no obvious dividing lines between them. We create divisions like individual soul, soul families, and oversouls, to make it comprehensible for our human mind.
— So, one aspect of my individual soul is just the sum of my one incarnation. But a slightly higher/broader version of my individual soul is the sum of all my individual alternative/parallel selves/timelines. It is like a pyramid hierarchy, with each higher level containing more of everything below it. Seth says we are totally individual beings, but we are also totally part of a larger entity. At least, that is one way of describing it.
I have two articles on the Soul, both of which have additional information on this topic.
Q3. Lastly, .., in highest dimensions, does it mean all souls are one and there is access to ‘all’ that there possibly is?
A3. Yes. See my response to Q2, above. In addition, that highest dimension has been called the Universal Soul, Universal Mind, and Akashic Records. (It is the last dimension before Source, which is beyond the dimensions.) At that level, there is only the one soul/mind that contains knowledge of **everything in existence**, past-present-future. Many psychics, channelers, and Akashic readers claim to tap into that level when they bring their information through. I think they approach it, but I doubt that they have full access to it.
Blessings, Alan